On a rigorous proof Riemann Hypothesis proposition

when I was a freshman at the university of JiLIn ,I particularly been interested in Rimmann zeta function proposition,I had been studying Euler's product. I believe that I can best convey my thanks for the honor which the Academy has some degree conferred on me, through my admission as one of its correspondents,if I speedily make use of the permission there by recevied to communicate an investigation into the accumulation of prime numbers;a topic which  which perhaps seems not  wholly unworthy of  such a communication, given the  interest which Guss and Dirichlet have themselves shown in it over a lengthy period.  for this investigation my point of departure is provided by the observation of Euler that each complex number s=a+i*b or s=a-i*b complex number on any arbitrary real value zeta(a+i*b)/zeta(1-a-i*b)=pi^(s-1/2)gama(1/2-s/2)/gama(s/2) is ture. a more regular behaviour than that would be exhibited by the function, which already in the first hundred is seen very distinctly to agree with Li(a)+log(zeta(s).when Im(s)=1376046.5131=bx,we have x=2474063。bx=e^14.13147251 ture value。