【Topic-Based Writing】美国老编谈心得(续)

Topic-Based Writing:美国老编谈心得,我列出了Utpala推荐的TBW优秀写作范本。在这一节续中,她分享了TBW的实际操作经验。有个别观点与我以往的写作观点很不同,我仍然持保留态度,今后找机会与业内人士交流。

  • Do a quick audit: In your current topic/document (此处,Utpala的意图是尽快切入task主题,topic-based writing中,topic比例中要以task为主。)

    • How long does it take for your reader to get to the first task?
    • What is in the way?
    • What can you remove?
    • What is the proportion of task topics to concept and reference topics?
      • Brown = task
      • Blue = concept
      • Green = reference
      • Red = Other
    • Do the majority of topics emphasize doing real work instead of knowing something about the product?
  • Eliminate distracting, cumbersome introductory material. Reduce the ‘meta-text’ imposed on readers (这块是我持保留意见的,我觉得文档在注意实用性的同时,也应保持文档的全面性,我还是会在文档中保留这些信息。对于chapter-level TOC,我通常的做法是,用ordered list 将主要的task串起来,放在一章的首页。)

    • About this book
    • Chapter-level TOCs
    • Typographical convention lists
  • Remove sections dedicated to:

    • Long product descriptions
    • Pictures and descriptions of every button in the interface (对于那些很明显的,我同样也会选择一代而过)
    • Definitions of terms and acronyms (这一块也是仁者见仁的一点。有少数入门级读者,真是抱着学习的心态在看手册(而不是在遇到操作困难时),他们希望有这样的信息)
  • Emphasize tasks over concepts

    • Embed necessary small concepts at the beginning of a task to provide context (这点非常赞同。小的概念放在task前面讲最合适。每个task的第一段,都是要向读者解释goal--why do i need to do this task, what benefit will I get by doing this task? 此时,正好可将small concept一并放入。)
    • Refer to larger concepts elsewhere in the doc (如果概念解释内容很多,那还是另立conceptual topic合适)
    • Cut concepts that are not essential to the task or goal
  • Task List - Eliminate all unnecessary information

    • Is the task real? Or are we representing it as a task when it is not one?
    • Is the task necessary to meet customer goals?
    • Is the task not obvious to customers? (对于显而易见的操作,就不用大张旗鼓把它也写成一个task啦,比如编辑/删除一条信息,如果已经把创建这条信息写成了task, 不妨把编辑与删除,以一个note的形式加在创建task的后面;或者可以直接不写。)
    • Is the task a single task?
    • Do customers already know how to perform the task?
    • Do they already have background information?
    • How critical is the consequence of failure? Provide error and recovery in another section. (这点容易忽略!是点好建议)
    • Can this information be effectively transmitted in the planned media?

系列文章

最后编辑于
©著作权归作者所有,转载或内容合作请联系作者
平台声明:文章内容(如有图片或视频亦包括在内)由作者上传并发布,文章内容仅代表作者本人观点,简书系信息发布平台,仅提供信息存储服务。

推荐阅读更多精彩内容