C43562 Day11 否认前因型谬误

If faculty members are tenured, (A) then they are very politically conservative (B).  —Premise

And none of our better teachers are tenured, (not-A) —premise, therefore, none of them are politically conservative.(not-B) —premise.

Attack: The arguer commits “failure to see other reasons” fallacy. The arguer means since our tenured faculty members are very politically conservative and none of our better teachers are tenured, so our better teachers are not conservative. As a matter of fact, there are a number of other reasons that are sufficient to bring about politically conservative in addition to tenured, which means that tenured may be  sufficient but not necessary for politically conservative being true.

©著作权归作者所有,转载或内容合作请联系作者
【社区内容提示】社区部分内容疑似由AI辅助生成,浏览时请结合常识与多方信息审慎甄别。
平台声明:文章内容(如有图片或视频亦包括在内)由作者上传并发布,文章内容仅代表作者本人观点,简书系信息发布平台,仅提供信息存储服务。

相关阅读更多精彩内容

友情链接更多精彩内容