讲解：R、R、Engineering Computation

16/5/18, 1(38 pmcomp20005 Engineering ComputationPage 1 of 2https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/ammoffat/teaching/20005/ass2/ass2-rubric-master.htmlcomp20005 Assignment 2 Feedback: XXUSERNAMEXXMarks will not go below zero in each section. The overall mark is the sum of the three section marks.Program PresentationIncluding: layout and style, readability, adherence to coding expectations, general care and appearance.Stage 1 initial allocation, +3;Stage 2 initial allocation, +1;Stage 3 initial allocation, +0;Stage 4 initial allocation, +0;Deductions made for:#defines not in upper case, -0.5;multi-letter variables in upper case, -0.5;absence of function prototypes, -0.5;bad choice for function names, -0.5;bad choices for variable names, -0.5;inconsistent bracket placement, -0.5;inconsistent indentation, -0.5;excessive commenting, -0.5;insufficient commenting, -0.5;lack of whitespace (visual appeal), -0.5;lines >80 chars, -0.5;no authorship statement, -0.5;use of external code without attribution, -1.0;use of magic numbers, -0.5;use of futile #defines, -0.5;other stylistic issue (minor), -0.5;other stylistic issue (major), -1.0;Additions (only applied if marks lost within this section):comment that says &"programming is fun&", +0.5;overall care and presentation, +0.5;Other comments from marker:Structure and ApproachIncluding: decomposition in to functions, development of data structures and declaration of them at theappropriate locations (Stage 4), choice of parameters to functions, choice of algorithms or methods.Stage 1 initial allocation, +2;Stage 2 initial allocation, +3;Stage 3 initial allocation, +2;Stage 4 initial代做R实验作业、R作业帮做、代写留学生Engineering Computation课程设计 allocation, +2;16/5/18, 1(38 pmcomp20005 Engineering ComputationPage 2 of 2https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/ammoffat/teaching/20005/ass2/ass2-rubric-master.htmlDeductions made for:duplicate code segments, -0.5;main program too long or too complex, -1.0;other functions too long or too complex, -0.5;global variables, -1.0;insufficient use of functions, -0.5;excessively complex algorithmic approach, -0.5;unnecessary duplication/copying of data, -0.5avoidance of structs (eg, using multiple 2d arrays), -1.0;avoidance of struct pointers (eg, using whole-struct arguments), -0.5;inappropriate or over-complex structs, -0.5;other abuses of structs, -0.5;Other comments from marker:Program executionIncluding: compilation, execution on test data, output presentation and readability. (Programs that do notcompile in the test environment will lose all marks in this section.)Stage 1 initial allocation, +1;Stage 2 initial allocation, +2;Stage 3 initial allocation, +2;Stage 4 initial allocation, +2;Deductions made for:errors in compilation that prevent testing, -5.0;runtime segmentation fault on test1 with no output generated, -2.0;runtime segmentation fault on test2 with no output generated, -2.0;unnecessary warning messages in compilation, -1.0;incorrect Stage 1 results on test1 or test2 (or both), -1.0;incorrect Stage 2 results on test1 or test2 (or both), -1.0;incorrect Stage 3 results on test1 or test2 (or both), -1.0;incorrect Stage 4 results on test1 or test2 (or both), -1.0;notably different results formatting in any Stage, -1.0;XXMARKXXOverall comments from marker:Assignment Marker: XXMARKERXX Subject Coordinator: Alistair Moffat, & 转自：http://ass.3daixie.com/2018052758777370.html