可用性指南:设计过程与结果评估
1.1提供可用内容
相关重要指数:5级
证据强度:5级
文件类型:指南
主题:
UCD(以用户为中心的设计,User-Centered Design)
指南:
给用户提供有趣的、有价值的、恰当的内容。
注释:
内容是一个网站所提供的信息。不要为错误的内容浪费方便访问的渠道和良好的可用性等资源。一项研究表明内容是一个网站上最重要的元素。其他研究也有报道,内容比导航、视觉设计、功能性、交互性更重要。
资源:
1. Asher, S.R. (1980). Topic interest and children’s reading comprehension. In R.J. Sprio, D.C. Bruce, & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp. 525-534). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Badre, A.N. (2002). Shaping Web Usability: Interaction Design in Context. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley Professional.
3. Baldwin, R.S., Peleg-Bruckner, Z., & McClintock, A. (1985). Effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on reading comprehension, Reading Research Quarterly, 220(4), 497-504.
4. Celsi, R. & Olson, J. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210-224.
6. Levine, R. (1996). Guide to Web Style. Sun Microsystems.
7. Nielsen, J. & Tahir, M. (2002). Homepage Usability: 50 Sites Deconstructed. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing.
8.Nielsen, J. (1997b, June). Top ten mistakes of Web management. Retrieved November 2005
9. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing Web Usability. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
11. Sano, D. (1996). Designing Large-scale Web Sites: A Visual Design Methodology. New York: Wiley.
13. Spyridakis, J.H. (2000). Guidelines for authoring comprehensible web pages and evaluating their success. Technical Communication, 47(3), 359-382.
14. Stevens, K. (1980). The effect of topic interest on the reading comprehension of higher ability students. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 365-368.
相关资源:
相关可用性指南:
1.Usability Guideline: Set and State Goals
名词解释:
1. 相对重要指数:Relative Importance,基于“这个准则对网站的成功有多重要”的问题对准则进行评分。
2. 证据强度:Strength of Evidence,表征证据特征的重要概念;