Nowadays, in countries, there is a high of rate unemployment. An increasing number of people are concerned that only primary education is necessary. However，this statement is a controversial issue. I do not agree with this statement.
First, it is obvious that for most companies, they want more talents and more people with creative thinking, people with only primary education are probably without these things, so if there is less talents for a company, a company will have less technology and innovation, and the country will not be in the lead in the world.
Moreover，people with only primary education are easier crime. For example, a high education person will not take crime easily, they can earn money by themselves, they know crime will lead to touch the law and will be punished. According to this, if there is less high-educated people in a country, there will be higher crime rate and social instability.
Some people will say that when less people receive secondary education. The government can save money. This is true when you take short look but see from future. It will cost very big and unsolved problem not only to society but to the whole country.
In summary, government cannot overlook this problem. They should consider long-term effect, spend more money on secondary education will not be a waste, as a country have more talents, they will bring more money. This is the best way to build a butter future for everyone.
Stone
