Why Chinese government decided to embark supply-side structual reform and finally failed

We know the fundamental principle in economics is the famous formula:

Supply = Demand.

But the reality is always Supply > Demand in nowaday China.

Why?

Demand is basicly composed by three carriages:

Investment, Consumption, and Export

But the truth is:

Investment ---- Overplus;

Consumption ---- Fatigue;

Export ---- Recession.

How to do?

Expand the consumption;

Maintain the investment;

Exploit the export.

In consideration of the current situation in China, the first option is the best and most efficient choice.

Now is another question:

Is real estate consumption or investment?

Analysis:

Real estate seems like consumption, but now in China it more looks like investment. Since civilians can't afford the extremely high price. As an investment, buyers do not only want to lose their money but also try everything to maintain and enhance the price of their properties, so does the government and developers.

The consquence:

The money which should have been spent on consumption now is used to buy(or invest in) real estate, which explains the phenomenon that M2 declines as the monetary supply rises.

So, since options on expanding demand all failed ( if not, at least can't say it is success), there is only left the last choice:

Optimize supply or supply-side structual reform

But is it easy to achieve?

最后编辑于
©著作权归作者所有,转载或内容合作请联系作者
【社区内容提示】社区部分内容疑似由AI辅助生成,浏览时请结合常识与多方信息审慎甄别。
平台声明:文章内容(如有图片或视频亦包括在内)由作者上传并发布,文章内容仅代表作者本人观点,简书系信息发布平台,仅提供信息存储服务。

相关阅读更多精彩内容

  • rljs by sennchi Timeline of History Part One The Cognitiv...
    sennchi阅读 7,908评论 0 10
  • 之前自学过vue,构建项目直接用vue-cli,最近在学习如何自己构建项目,于是就选择了vue+webpack(本...
    半瓶不满阅读 858评论 1 3
  • runtime消息机制Class isa:指向metaclass,也就是静态的Class。一般一个Obj对象中的i...
    陆号阅读 266评论 0 0

友情链接更多精彩内容