今天我读了《小野猪》
这篇文章，这篇文章深深的刻在了我的脑海中，这篇文章主要讲的是一只小野猪，出生于纳德尔森林，他与他的母亲和谐相处，但是在一次捕猎中还小，外面的世界那么壮阔，自己和不如出去浪一浪呢但是他刚出门，就遇见了一个捕兽夹，将她的腿夹伤了，好在那互猎人家有两个可爱的小女儿，他们开心的收养了小猪，给他起名为“赤兔福林.瑟尔.FridgeKiba。”简名为“瑟㖩尔。”但是在一次旅行中，小眼珠被一个富家男孩，也是一个残忍的男孩看中了，于是他的母亲便用10万美元为那个小男孩换下了那头小猪，就这样瑟㖩尔进入了这个残酷的世界， 离开了那个充满美好与爱的地区，但是谁知那个男孩买下这头小猪，不是干什么只是把那头小猪当做自己玩具枪的练板子，但幸好小男孩的母亲还通人情给小猪制造了一个森林后花园，就在星期二的晚上，客人福林将军，来到了窗边，将自己的皮带枪挂上，说这个家伙别让那个小男孩拿过去了，这里这把枪是真的，伤了他可别怪我没提醒，尽管那个小男孩受到了警告，但是他还是拿起了真枪对准小猪设了一枪，最终小猪倒在了血泊中，而小男孩却因为有十个律师的庇护，并且用巨额打下了10万人的官司，所以他伤害无辜的事情也就被撤销，作废。
读完了这篇文章，我想到了“康德论人性的善恶 ，康德关于人性善恶的思想建立在他对人之本性的界定上、一定信念的人的自然本性而言，人并不涉及道德上的善恶问题、就人的理性本质而言。人的本性中既有向善的原初禀赋，又有趋恶的倾向、这为人向善或趋恶提供了可能性。康德说人的本性意味着出自自由的行动的根据、 由此人性的善或恶取决于自由的任意将道德法则作为动机或将违背道德法则的动机纳入准则的自由。”
读完了这篇文章，我从中明白了“人性本善，但不一定所有人都是善良，无意间的一个举动，已足以毁了一个人的一生，将那个人的一生表现的一文不值，毫无价值，毫无生存的信念。三思而后行，是从古至今的名言，我们现在应该依然遵守，古人云“三思而后行，必也，如不治，痛哉也。”
Today I read "little wild boar"
This article, this article is deeply engraved in my mind. This article is mainly about a little wild boar, born in Nader forest. He gets along well with his mother, but he is still small in a hunt. The outside world is so magnificent. He might as well go out and wave. But as soon as he went out, he met a trap and hurt her leg, Fortunately, the mutual Hunter family had two lovely little daughters. They happily adopted the pig and named him "Red Rabbit Flynn ser fridge Kiba." Jane's name is "Thur." But on a trip, the little eye was favored by a rich boy and a cruel boy, so his mother used $100000 to replace the pig for the little boy. In this way, Thur entered the cruel world and left the area full of beauty and love, but who knows that the boy bought the pig, I didn't do anything. I just used the little pig as a training board for my toy gun, but fortunately, the little boy's mother made a forest back garden for the little pig through human kindness. On Tuesday night, the guest, general Fulin, came to the window, hung his belt gun and said that this guy didn't let the little boy take it. Here's a real gun, If you hurt him, don't blame me for not reminding. Although the little boy was warned, he still picked up the real gun and set a shot at the pig. Finally, the pig fell into a pool of blood. However, because the little boy was sheltered by ten lawyers and brought a lawsuit against 100000 people with a huge amount of money, his injury to innocent people was revoked and invalidated.
After reading this article, I thought of it "Kant discusses the good and evil of human nature. Kant's Thought on the good and evil of human nature is based on his definition of human nature. In terms of the natural nature of human beings with certain beliefs, human beings are not involved in the problem of moral good and evil. In terms of the rational essence of human beings, human nature has both the original endowment for good and the tendency to evil, which provides the possibility for human beings to be good or evil. Kant said that human nature Nature means the basis of free action, so that the good or evil of human nature depends on the freedom to take moral law as motivation or incorporate the motivation against moral law into norms. "
After reading this article, I learned from it that "human nature is good, but not all people are good. An unintentional act is enough to destroy a person's life and show that person's life is worthless, worthless and has no belief in survival. It is a famous saying from ancient times to now that we should still abide by it, as the ancients said "If you think twice before you act, you will also. If you don't treat it, it will hurt."
