2.

Premise: The criminal mind simply cannot be rehabilitated.

Conclusion: True criminal mind cannot be rehabilitated.

Attack: It’s a Begging-the-question fallacy. The author has assumed that a criminal mind cannot be rehabilitated.However, his conclusion is the same with his premise. He doesn’t give telling evidence to support his conclusion.

4.

Premise: It is said in the Bile that all scripture is given by inspiration of god.

Conclusion: The Bile is the inspired word of God .

Attack: It’s a “arguing in a circle” fallacy. The author used the sentence in the passage as his argument to support his conclusion which is no difference with his premise. That’s not persuasive.