The Chrity Business-the new philanthropist
Tom Lloyd
They call it ‘caritas’, and they say it means love and care. They say they know how important management is, and some of them even say they have read Charles Hardy’s Understanding Voluntary Organizations, but they say you should not be paid £70,000 a year to run a charity. They say you should not be that when most of your helpers work for nothing but love, salaries like that are not appropriate; they say the new hard-headed, professional philosophy in charity is going too far, and has begun to undermine the ethos of the sector.
The first thing to note about British charities is that “charity” defines how their income spent, much more than it defines how it is raised.
好素材！！！
...this has nothing to do with the abrasively ambitious female manager who acts as if she believes the only way to breach the ramparts of sexual discrimination that surround senior management jobs is to be more macho than the male. in this case, management responsibility changes women more than it changes management, with the consequence that we end up, mot with more feminine managers, but more masuline women.
这个观点我第一次见到！好有意思！不过还有一部分原因是这么久以来的商业和经济学的理论都非常masculinity导致大家觉得管理层的符号就是男性咯。有了这样的标签埋在脑子里，做管理很难不往男性化发展呢。不过我觉得这个feminine manager的概念真的蛮值得思考的！
TBC
我终于有在看书了！虽然论文不一定用得到，但觉得不错不能白打这么多字w
