Rothko's painting——losing your sight so that you can "see"

We are often asked what we can tell from the paintings we see. No matter how difficult and complex the painting occurs to be, the depiction of objects can nevertheless give us traces of something for the viewer to interpret. However, little does the viewer have any clue when s/he encounters Rothko's painting. Since it presents nothing other than color fields——we could not see anything. Before Rothko's painting, we are all bind.


However, this is the goal that Rothko ultimately intends to achieve through these paintings——to deprive the viewer of sight.

In the book memories of the blind, Derrida addresses the significance of artworks in the light of blindness. Blindness not only refers to the necessary "perception" for drawing but to the content of drawings. For Derrida, the production of art is essentially a destructive act, though its purpose is transmitting insight. The ruse by which Odysseus blinds the cyclops corresponds to the strategy by which an artist's skill exerts control on the raw material of the subject and reveals its tracé. Through the tracé, every drawing participates in the signification of every other drawing in a remarkable confluence of profound blindness and blazing insight. Every drawing is correspondingly a ruin, signifying that which is not apparent in the tracé as well as that which is explicit.


Echoing Derrida, Rothko's painting is centered around elimination and responds to the idea of tracé. He aims to eliminate everything we perceive and take for granted in this world. This idea of elimination resonates with the process of his creation when he combines the technique of watercolor with the oil painting. The repetitive process of painting and covering responds to Derrida's "remarkable confluence of profound blindness and blazing insight." As he covers the first layer with the second one, the first layer becomes a ruin that manifests on the second layer in the form of traces. Hence, the course of covering and overlapping is producing and decomposing traces that retain the implicit meaning of the inner world. As though he was trying to erase every likelihood of secularity and bring a contemplative image into the light.

Rather than supposing us to tell what we see in paintings, Rothko intends to evoke a telling of what we cannot see. Indeed, Rothko's painting renders us blind in contrast to most painters whose purpose on paintings is "opening your eyes". Those paintings are often rich in content and dedicated to telling a grand narrative reflecting the outside world. Rothko's paintings, in this case, seem to be secluded from the world of secularity.


This is where we embrace the emotionally provocative paintings in Rothko's chapel. The space contains 14 murals created by artist Rothko. Like many of his other works of art, Rothko places those large-scale paintings in a secluded room, the space solely for the viewer and those paintings. The interaction between space and those paintings coincides with the one that flows between the viewer and them. Here, the idea of elimination is well-represented. Rather than depicting the outside world, Rothko is at pains to use the brush to eliminate the "shape of the world" and recuperates the world of spirituality. In this sense, instead of enabling the viewers to recognize the secularity of themselves in the world, his paintings bring light to the inner world that we hardly notice with the hustle and bustle of the secular world. As he says: "The elimination of content is a removal of all obstacles between the painter and the idea and between the idea and the observer."

The avoidance of the content is only the avoidance of the references of the outside world. Rothko wants to draw our attention to the world of ideas, or precisely the world of emotions. This is why often we see people standing in front of his paintings with tears streaming down on their cheeks. There is something hidden in those contentless paintings that touches these viewers from within. The surface of those paintings does not tell anything but leaves the work of storytelling to the sentiment. The most touchable words in this world are perhaps the words of silence; the most touching shape perhaps is shapeless. The words that can only be uttered by wordless expressions----the dialogue that is transpiring between two hearts.


Once, Rothko was taking an interview with New York Times magazine when he was asked what he was trying to do with his art. He said:

"My work of art is a place where two sadness can meet, and both of us need to feel less sad."   

This is where Rothko's painting goes to be great. The deprivation of sight, namely the secular sight is, in fact, the restoration of the sight, essentially, the spiritual sight, through which we perceive a wider world that incorporates the consciousness of our inner world. As Derrida says: "Blindness becomes the sacrifice for seeing." In Rothko's chapel, alone with many other his paintings, we come to our true selves in contemplation and through baptism with tears.


This is why the tears account for an important factor in Rothko's idea of painting. Resembling a course of religious renewal, the response we have to Rothko's paintings sanctifies us into new selves. It is through this sanctification that we are able to retrieve our sight and conceive the idea of who we are. The implicate tear reflects on Augustine's numerous references to weeping and tears, symbolic of clouded vision and acquired insight.

Paralleling Augustine's tears that signify a moment of recognition as well as an articulation of "inexpressible groanings," of sentiments that are too profound to be expressed in human words (Rm 8:26), Rothko renders tear necessary for expressing emotions. The tear is a sign of the interaction between viewers and the work of art. It is a physical act that reflects what Rothko himself calls "the human condition". Crying is the most striking manifestation of Rothko's painting. In the wake of crying comes the profound recognition of one's true self. Things in Rothko's painting bring us notes that are resonating, stirred. Therefore, tear connects not to the sadness but cognitive experience, namely, the encounter with ourselves in the realm of spirit.

©著作权归作者所有,转载或内容合作请联系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末,一起剥皮案震惊了整个滨河市,随后出现的几起案子,更是在滨河造成了极大的恐慌,老刑警刘岩,带你破解...
    沈念sama阅读 214,922评论 6 497
  • 序言:滨河连续发生了三起死亡事件,死亡现场离奇诡异,居然都是意外死亡,警方通过查阅死者的电脑和手机,发现死者居然都...
    沈念sama阅读 91,591评论 3 389
  • 文/潘晓璐 我一进店门,熙熙楼的掌柜王于贵愁眉苦脸地迎上来,“玉大人,你说我怎么就摊上这事。” “怎么了?”我有些...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 160,546评论 0 350
  • 文/不坏的土叔 我叫张陵,是天一观的道长。 经常有香客问我,道长,这世上最难降的妖魔是什么? 我笑而不...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 57,467评论 1 288
  • 正文 为了忘掉前任,我火速办了婚礼,结果婚礼上,老公的妹妹穿的比我还像新娘。我一直安慰自己,他们只是感情好,可当我...
    茶点故事阅读 66,553评论 6 386
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭开白布。 她就那样静静地躺着,像睡着了一般。 火红的嫁衣衬着肌肤如雪。 梳的纹丝不乱的头发上,一...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 50,580评论 1 293
  • 那天,我揣着相机与录音,去河边找鬼。 笑死,一个胖子当着我的面吹牛,可吹牛的内容都是我干的。 我是一名探鬼主播,决...
    沈念sama阅读 39,588评论 3 414
  • 文/苍兰香墨 我猛地睁开眼,长吁一口气:“原来是场噩梦啊……” “哼!你这毒妇竟也来了?” 一声冷哼从身侧响起,我...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 38,334评论 0 270
  • 序言:老挝万荣一对情侣失踪,失踪者是张志新(化名)和其女友刘颖,没想到半个月后,有当地人在树林里发现了一具尸体,经...
    沈念sama阅读 44,780评论 1 307
  • 正文 独居荒郊野岭守林人离奇死亡,尸身上长有42处带血的脓包…… 初始之章·张勋 以下内容为张勋视角 年9月15日...
    茶点故事阅读 37,092评论 2 330
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相恋三年,在试婚纱的时候发现自己被绿了。 大学时的朋友给我发了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃饭的照片。...
    茶点故事阅读 39,270评论 1 344
  • 序言:一个原本活蹦乱跳的男人离奇死亡,死状恐怖,灵堂内的尸体忽然破棺而出,到底是诈尸还是另有隐情,我是刑警宁泽,带...
    沈念sama阅读 34,925评论 5 338
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布,位于F岛的核电站,受9级特大地震影响,放射性物质发生泄漏。R本人自食恶果不足惜,却给世界环境...
    茶点故事阅读 40,573评论 3 322
  • 文/蒙蒙 一、第九天 我趴在偏房一处隐蔽的房顶上张望。 院中可真热闹,春花似锦、人声如沸。这庄子的主人今日做“春日...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 31,194评论 0 21
  • 文/苍兰香墨 我抬头看了看天上的太阳。三九已至,却和暖如春,着一层夹袄步出监牢的瞬间,已是汗流浃背。 一阵脚步声响...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 32,437评论 1 268
  • 我被黑心中介骗来泰国打工, 没想到刚下飞机就差点儿被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留,地道东北人。 一个月前我还...
    沈念sama阅读 47,154评论 2 366
  • 正文 我出身青楼,却偏偏与公主长得像,于是被迫代替她去往敌国和亲。 传闻我的和亲对象是个残疾皇子,可洞房花烛夜当晚...
    茶点故事阅读 44,127评论 2 352

推荐阅读更多精彩内容