The book clearly states that he calls himself metaphysics, and that metaphysics is like breathing to humans. He calls his philosophy metaphysics. However, he said that although this is actually the first use of this form, as long as we pay attention to the principles that speculation has risked to go beyond its boundaries and examine their inevitable consequences more carefully, in fact, it does not expand our rational movement, but narrows it down.
Due to these principles, current threats aim to expand their emotional boundaries that originally belonged to them to encompass everything, thereby completely rejecting the purely practical rational movement.
If we don't pay attention, instead of shrinking, it will indeed expand. After expanding, we can use theoretical rationality to lift up practical rationality, which is precisely the problem we encounter in today's society. Because those who study natural sciences and social sciences speak of rationality as theoretical rationality, so today we say that it is difficult for us to defend many of them. You said on TV a few days ago that it seems like it is medical reform or something.
Then, he set up an international medical center in the suburbs of Shanghai, which actually serves the rich. More than a decade ago, there was a deputy to the National People's Congress. The guy was also a professor of the Second Medical College. Now, the old man, we just need to keep pace with the market and let the market the final say. How can the market the final say?
We will do whatever the market needs. The plan he proposed at that time was to provide high-end medical care and send the poor to low-end hospitals, which is for the wealthy. Now, more than a decade later, it has been implemented. As we need medical reform now, it should benefit ordinary people. He now charges 300 yuan for registration and 3000 yuan for a day's stay in a ward, which is the lowest level. The high-end presidential suite costs 50000 yuan per day.
I may be conservative about this kind of thing, but I feel that even in a city like Shanghai, I am a bit worried about its market prospects. If someone can afford that price, someone like you, may go to Switzerland for medical treatment. He doesn't need to come and deal with you here. The doctors here go to Changhai Hospital, and he himself admits to calling Changhai Hospital, Xinhua Hospital, and various hospitals in Shanghai to go to the ward. How clever is that.
He's just lying to you. The whole ward is made like a star rated hotel, with all kinds of bathing equipment or whatever, just like this. He hasn't even considered you. Firstly, it's not called medical reform. Secondly, what is the purpose of our medical reform?
It's not discussed now. What he's discussing now is that market needs are legal and market needs are natural. I accidentally opened a WeChat group that has nothing to do with me. They discuss all kinds of capitalists, and their personal identities are all capitalists. When they talk about it, the market is naturally reasonable, and the future politics will be naturally reasonable. That is to say, the opinions of the majority are naturally reasonable, and we should trust the majority.
Are you joking? Our country now believes that the market should always be rational, which is instrumental rationality and theoretical rationality.
I'm not arguing in this way, it doesn't mean that if someone buys my goods, I have reason. You are such a big country, and it is a poor country with a large number of poor people, and because their quality of life and living conditions are poor, they are more likely to get sick. If you don't take care of these people, now you have limited medical resources. Our country's medical resources are already very limited, and Hong Kong's population is not as large as Shanghai's. Let's not talk about population. Shanghai's ambulance fleet is only one fourth of Hong Kong's total, but Hong Kong's population is about seven to eight million, while Shanghai's is nearly 30 million. Many people die on the road, or in other words, they don't die at home. You call them and tell them you're sorry, the cars are on the road, and many people die like this.
Something like this has become a major news item on television, serving as a model idea for the latest round of reform in Shanghai. So, inside, what we lack now is not rationality, but a sense of justice, and what is lacking behind the sense of justice?
What is lacking is a true practical rationality, and there are too many injustices that we can ignore. Only when you said that human life is of paramount importance, he is doing it now. If you want to go to winter and take a look, I once saw tears fall from my eyes. Why?
In the winter, the ambulance came and couldn't get in because the floor was full of people, and the emergency room was already full of people sleeping on the floor, so there was no place to get in. Therefore, when getting in and out of the emergency car, there must be a place for you to put it. The problem is that the emergency phone outside is calling again, and your car should come quickly. He said I couldn't come, my car couldn't get out at all. Why?
This place is no longer available. I don't need to talk about those so-called officials. As long as they reach the official level, what kind of accommodation conditions do they have? Of course, all of us should climb up. Many young people use it as their lifelong goal, because indeed, he has his so-called practical rationality, because if I step into that level, I will also have a worry free life.
However, the problem is that for most of us, I think we need to have a sense of justice. A society without angry young people must have problems because they turn a blind eye to injustice. Then, they spend their days in the hip-hop of popular songs and the boring laughter on the internet.
Turning a blind eye to these issues, but one day, you will also come to a point where you cannot enter. When you are old or sick, your body will not be as good as it is now. It is also possible that a heat wave or some cold wave will come and you will collapse.
You may also be sleeping on the floor, because this time there is no teacher in our department who is seriously ill. He also saw your professor sleeping on the floor, and countless people are hanging out with you. So, because I once went to the emergency room at night, and indeed, the doctor didn't wonder. You two had no place in the emergency room, and the young doctor told me that he saw me as an intellectual. We are talking like this now, countless foul air is breathing into him, and he has no room to turn around.
The patient's family members are very anxious, and the patient himself is also anxious. If he goes to see me at 10:12 pm, he will definitely feel uncomfortable. Only when he feels uncomfortable will he go. They all ask him how my situation is, and he really has no choice. He hasn't finished speaking yet, and there are three or four mouths next to him asking for an answer. How is that possible.
Some of you work on aircraft carriers, while others work on lunar exploration. You can't build more hospitals, you can't significantly increase the salaries of doctors, and you can train more doctors. We are now transferring from traditional Chinese medicine classes, and many of them come from medical schools. He knows why medical schools come, and we know it in our hearts. Studying medicine is not beneficial, so I want to come over.
When we talk about Kant today, we need to think about him. From his biography, he seems to be a scholar who is indifferent to the world, but in fact, he is full of care and enthusiasm for humanity. This is something we cannot ignore when he appears to be very reserved on the surface.
If you go back to the library and see the books written by our professor, you will know what they are. There are some things that you are not afraid of comparing goods, and once you compare, you can make a judgment based on the comparison. You can tell what kind of person he is, what he is talking about, and what issues he cares about.
He said that he would lead to the complete exclusion, where pure implementation can be applied. Therefore, a realistic and expansive judgment is actually his first pure rational criticism. Although the criticism he wants to make is negative, he also uses it to eliminate limitations or even threats, completely eliminating obstacles to the practical application of reason.
Attention should be paid to the practical application of rationality, which is used to judge social things. We have already been abolished, and at the same time, we need to eliminate the restrictions on the operation of the rational world, which actually has a very important and positive use.
As long as we are convinced that pure reason has a completely necessary realization, morally we must have reason, which can be avoided from expanding beyond the boundaries of sensibility. For this reason, although he does not need any help from longing, he must resist his reaction and ensure himself.
Now standing in the first few years of the 21st century, I increasingly feel that this sentence, I blame myself for not understanding and not paying attention to it, does not need any help from rational thinking. Don't talk to me about logical reasoning that is wrong. On the contrary, you should resist his reaction. Don't tell me that according to the law of market input-output, our international medical center should handle it. You originally told me to resist their reaction in order to create ideological contradictions.
Because reason is a moral movement, it is a direct absolute command, don't ask anything. The so-called rational people we all agree with, so we will talk about it soon. Because I feel like there were some things I didn't explain before last time.
So, this time we will explain why Kant is also famous. The moral law is ultimately an absolute command, and you must not say whether it is advantageous or disadvantageous to me. That is a false command. Hypothetical commands are possible if they are used, I agree if they are used, but I disagree if they are not used. Moral commands are not what they are. From the beginning, moral commands were that you must, you should, there is no such thing as' if ', and now we are all' if ', which is a problem.
So, of course, there are many people who follow Kant today, but not many who follow him. However, we also need to think of him. The report we just read is very important because he tells us that the principles of scientific knowledge, if they create a legitimate scope of use, will inevitably lead to the rejection of rational practical application, that is, the rejection of moral law.
