参考范文
In contemporary society, the debate over the length of the working week and the duration of the weekend has become increasingly prominent. Some advocate for a shorter working week and a longer weekend, while others hold a different view. From my perspective, I strongly agree with the former viewpoint.
A shorter working week can bring numerous benefits. Firstly, it can significantly reduce work-related stress and burnout. In today's fast-paced work environment, employees are often under immense pressure to meet deadlines and achieve targets. By reducing the number of working days, employees can have more time to relax and recharge, which in turn can improve their mental and physical well-being. For example, in some European countries where the working week is relatively short, employees report higher levels of job satisfaction and lower rates of stress-related illnesses.
Secondly, a longer weekend can boost consumer spending and stimulate economic growth. With more free time, people are more likely to engage in leisure activities such as shopping, dining out, and traveling. This increased consumption can have a positive ripple effect on various industries, creating more job opportunities and driving economic development.
However, some may argue that a shorter working week could lead to a decrease in productivity. They believe that longer working hours are necessary to maintain high levels of output. Yet this view overlooks the fact that overworked employees are often less efficient and more prone to making mistakes. In fact, many studies have shown that shorter working hours can actually enhance productivity by improving focus and motivation.
In conclusion, a shorter working week and a longer weekend are not only beneficial for employees' well being but also for the overall economy. It is a win-win situation that should be embraced by employers and policymakers alike.
译文
在当代社会，关于工作周长度和周末时长的争论日益突出。一些人主张缩短工作周并延长周末，而另一些人则持不同观点。从我的角度来看，我强烈同意前者的观点。
缩短工作周可以带来诸多好处。首先，它可以显著减少与工作相关的压力和倦怠。在当今快节奏的工作环境中，员工往往面临着完成截止日期和实现目标的巨大压力。通过减少工作日数量，员工可以有更多时间放松和恢复精力，这反过来可以改善他们的身心健康。例如，在一些工作周相对较短的欧洲国家，员工报告的工作满意度更高，压力相关疾病的发病率也更低。
其次，更长的周末可以刺激消费并促进经济增长。有了更多的空闲时间，人们更有可能参与购物、外出就餐和旅行等休闲活动。这种消费的增加可以对各个行业产生积极的连锁反应，创造更多的就业机会并推动经济发展。
然而，有些人可能会认为缩短工作周可能导致生产力下降。他们认为，更长的工作时间对于维持高水平的产出是必要的。但这种观点忽视了一个事实，即过度劳累的员工往往效率更低，更容易犯错。事实上，许多研究表明，缩短工作时间实际上可以通过提高专注力和积极性来提高生产力。
总之，缩短工作周并延长周末不仅有利于员工的福祉，也有利于整体经济。这是一个雇主和政策制定者都应该接受的双赢局面。
雅思核心词汇
名词
• contemporary [kənˈtemprəri] adj. 当代的，现代的 n. 同代人
• debate [dɪˈbeɪt] n. 辩论，讨论
• duration [djuˈreɪʃn] n. 持续时间，期间
• perspective [pəˈspektɪv] n. 观点，视角
• stress [stres] n. 压力
• burnout [ˈbɜːnaʊt] n. 过度疲劳，耗尽
• environment [ɪnˈvaɪrənmənt] n. 环境
• deadline [ˈdedlaɪn] n. 截止日期
• target [ˈtɑːɡɪt] n. 目标
• satisfaction [ˌsætɪsˈfækʃn] n. 满意
• illness [ˈɪlnəs] n. 疾病
• consumption [kənˈsʌmpʃn] n. 消费
• industry [ˈɪndəstri] n. 行业，工业
• opportunity [ˌɒpəˈtjuːnəti] n. 机会
• productivity [ˌprɒdʌkˈtɪvəti] n. 生产力
• efficiency [ɪˈfɪʃnsi] n. 效率
• motivation [ˌməʊtɪˈveɪʃn] n. 动机，积极性
动词
• advocate [ˈædvəkeɪt] v. 提倡，主张
• reduce [rɪˈdjuːs] v. 减少
• relax [rɪˈlæks] v. 放松
• recharge [ˌriːˈtʃɑːdʒ] v. 恢复精力
• engage [ɪnˈɡeɪdʒ] v. 参与
• overlook [ˌəʊvəˈlʊk] v. 忽视
形容词
• prominent [ˈprɒmɪnənt] adj. 突出的，显著的
• immense [ɪˈmens] adj. 巨大的
• positive [ˈpɒzətɪv] adj. 积极的
• overall [ˌəʊvərˈɔːl] adj. 全面的，总体的
副词
• significantly [sɪɡˈnɪfɪkəntli] adv. 显著地
• actually [ˈæktʃuəli] adv. 实际上
雅思高分句型总结
1. Some advocate for..., while others hold a different view.
（一些人主张……，而另一些人持不同观点。用于引出不同观点，使文章结构清晰。）
2. From my perspective, I strongly agree with the former viewpoint.
（从我的角度来看，我强烈同意前者的观点。明确表达自己的立场。）
3. With more free time, people are more likely to engage in...
（有了更多的空闲时间，人们更有可能参与…… 用于阐述某种现象或行为的可能性。）
4. This increased consumption can have a positive ripple effect on..., creating more job opportunities and driving economic development.
（这种消费的增加可以对……产生积极的连锁反应，创造更多的就业机会并推动经济发展。说明某种行为带来的积极影响。）
5. Yet this view overlooks the fact that...
（但这种观点忽视了一个事实，即…… 用于反驳对方观点，增强文章的说服力。）
参考范文2
While the proposal to shorten the working week and extend weekends may seem appealing for work-life balance, I disagree with this idea. A longer weekend could undermine economic productivity, disrupt essential services, and fail to address the root causes of workplace burnout.
Firstly, reducing working hours risks lowering overall productivity. Many industries, such as manufacturing and tech development, rely on consistent workflows to meet deadlines. For example, Japan’s “shunto” (spring wage negotiations) thrive on intensive 40-hour workweeks to maintain its global competitiveness in automotive production. A shorter week might force companies to hire more staff, increasing operational costs that could be passed on to consumers as higher prices.
Secondly, critical sectors like healthcare and emergency services cannot function with truncated workweeks. Hospitals require 24/7 staffing, and reducing weekly hours would create gaps in patient care. During the 2020 pandemic, countries with flexible scheduling (not shorter weeks) were better equipped to manage surging medical demands. Similarly, public transport systems depend on regular shifts to ensure commuter reliability; longer weekends might lead to service disruptions.
Finally, longer weekends do not necessarily solve burnout. Studies show that productivity declines when employees work beyond 50 hours weekly, but simply extending weekends without improving working conditions is ineffective. Companies like Microsoft Japan trialed a 4-day week in 2019, reporting higher productivity, but this relied on technological efficiency and reduced meetings—factors unrelated to weekend length. Without such structural changes, shorter workweeks could lead to rushed, low-quality output during weekdays.
In conclusion, while work-life balance is crucial, shortening the working week risks economic instability and service disruptions. Instead of focusing on weekend length, policymakers should prioritize flexible hours, remote work options, and mandatory breaks to address burnout effectively.
译文
尽管缩短工作周、延长周末的提议看似有利于工作与生活的平衡，但我对此持反对意见。更长的周末可能损害经济生产力，扰乱必要服务，并无法解决职场 burnout 的根源问题。
首先，减少工作时长可能降低整体生产力。许多行业（如制造业和技术开发）依赖连贯的工作流程来满足 deadlines。例如，日本的“春斗”（春季薪资谈判）依赖每周40小时的高强度工作，以维持其在汽车生产领域的全球竞争力。缩短工作周可能迫使企业雇佣更多员工，增加运营成本，最终以涨价形式转嫁给消费者。
其次，医疗和应急服务等关键部门无法在缩短的工作周下正常运转。医院需要24小时轮班，减少每周工时会造成患者护理缺口。2020年疫情期间，采用灵活排班（而非缩短工作周）的国家更能应对激增的医疗需求。同样，公共交通系统依赖规律的班次确保通勤可靠性，更长的周末可能导致服务中断。
最后，更长的周末未必能解决 burnout 问题。研究表明，员工每周工作超过50小时会降低效率，但仅延长周末而不改善工作条件是无效的。微软日本2019年试行四天工作制时报告生产力提升，但这依赖于技术效率提升和会议减少——这些因素与周末时长无关。若缺乏此类结构性改革，缩短工作周可能导致工作日产出仓促且质量低下。
总之，尽管工作与生活的平衡至关重要，但缩短工作周可能引发经济不稳定和服务中断。政策制定者应优先考虑灵活工时、远程办公选项和强制休息，而非单纯关注周末长度，以有效解决 burnout 问题。
