Summary

Start

• The work addresses the problem of XXX. (IoTj 20')
• The authors make an interesting work in this paper. (IoTj 20')
• The topic is relevant to the journal. (IoTj 20')
• The malware analysis in not a new topic but how this is significant and different for the IoT - needs more justification. (IoTj 20')
• The paper has made a significant effort on studying the XXX. (IoTj 20')
• In this paper, the authors conducted a comprehensive and systematic investigation of the evolution of XXX. (IoTj 20')
• The authors investigate XXX by leveraging the information from XXX that XXX. (IoTj 20')

Method

• To accomplish, the work exploits XXX. (IoTj 20')
• They investigate the currents XXX and use XXX to XXX. (IoTj 20')

Strength

1. Overall the paper is technically sound as most statements made in the paper are backed up by evidence or reference. (IoTj 20')
2. The article addresses an interesting, timely issue. (IoTj 20')
3. The use of XXX to XXX is quite novel (compared to just using XXX). (IoTj 20')
4. Their work is abundant and the experiments are also very rich. (IoTj 20')
5. The paper is inspiring for security researchers, especially the XXX using XXX. (IoTj 20')
6. This technique can be widely adopted in other domains as well. (IoTj 20')
7. Overall the paper is technically sound as most statements made in the paper are backed up by evidence or reference. (IoTj 20')
8. The release of the dataset is commendable and will be useful to the research community. (IoTj 20')
9. Please carefully check the full text for typos and grammatical problems. For example, there is a font problem in the XXXth paragraph of the left column on the XXX page. (IoTj 20')
10. Unlike traditional systematic research, this paper constructs a basic XXX of XXX. Specifically, the authors use XXX technology to XXX of XXX and XXX with XXX. Second, the authors design a novel classifier based on XXX to XXX. Finally, the research in this paper has been applied to XXX. Overall, this paper is well organized and provides a good XXX for the research community. (IoTj 20')
11. The idea of using XXX techniques to XXX is appealing. (IoTj 20')

Weakness

1. Some problems are still left. (IoTj 20')
2. However, there are two major concerns: (IoTj 20')
3. However, this paper still has the following minor issues to be solved: (IoTj 20')
4. However, there are two major concerns: XXX. (IoTj 20')
5. The addressed problem here seem a bit off or padded, in contrast to the rest of the work (and the work's broad objective). (IoTj 20')
6. However, the paper needs more improvement and discussion to the state of the art. (IoTj 20')
7. The motivation could be simplified by discussing a simplified use case to see the challenges and opportunities to the state of the art. (IoTj 20')
8. Therefore, the audience may be curious about XXX. (IoTj 20')
9. Many important references on IoT malware are missing. In this case, the credibility of the paper is doubted. (IoTj 20')
10. How to guarantee the completeness of XXX? (IoTj 20')
11. The current version has the following insufficiencies against the publication. (IoTj 20')
12. Before submitting the manuscript, please carefully check the grammar and spelling mistakes. (IoTj 20')