苹果审核被拒
由于开发时间，人工成本等问题。公司买了一份苹果源码，然后让我上架。
本来想做混淆处理的，但是涉及到直播+苹果内购等相关敏感性问题，所以我就没有混淆，直接打包，提交审核了。
使用的账号是已经购买3年的企业账号（99$），然后下午3点提交的，6点就进入审核状态了。
第二天发现被拒了。被拒内容如下：
Guideline 1.2 - Safety - User Generated Content
Your app enables the display of user-generated content but does not have the proper precautions in place.
Specifically, your app does not have a mechanism for users to flag objectionable content.
Next Steps
To resolve this issue, please revise your app to implement all of the following precautions:
- Require that users agree to terms (EULA) and these terms must make it clear that there is no tolerance for objectionable content or abusive users
- A method for filtering objectionable content
- A mechanism for users to flag objectionable content
- A mechanism for users to block abusive users
- The developer must act on objectionable content reports within 24 hours by removing the content and ejecting the user who provided the offending content
Please see attached screenshot for details.
这些附件可能会显示可能令人反感的内容，如裸露、色情和亵渎内容。
然后你会发现这些问题是正常app的被拒原因，并不是马甲包等重复代码相关问题。
然后我提交了申诉，申诉内容是告诉苹果 我们的app有这些审核机制，防止用户上传裸露、色情和亵渎内容 等内容。
第二天奇迹般的发现苹果又给拒了，过来这个坑，发现还有一个大坑。
这次被拒内容就尴尬了，看一眼就没救了。 内容如下：
发件人 Apple
1. 2 Safety: User Generated Content
Hello,
Thank you for your reply and for providing this information.
Upon further review, we found that your app does not comply with the following guidelines:
Guideline 2.1 - Information Needed
This type of app has been identified as one that may violate one or more of the following App Store Review Guidelines. Specifically, these types of apps often:
1.1.6 - Include false information, features, or misleading metadata
2.3.0 - Undergo significant concept changes after approval
2.3.1 - Have hidden or undocumented features, including hidden "switches" that redirect to a gambling or lottery website
3.1.1 - Use payment mechanisms other than in-app purchase to unlock features or functionality in the app
3.2.1 - Do not come from the financial institution performing the loan services
4.3.0 - Are a duplicate of another app or are conspicuously similar to another app
5.2.1 - Were not submitted by the legal entity that owns and is responsible for offering any services provided by the app
5.2.3 - Facilitate illegal file sharing or include the ability to save, convert, or download media from third party sources without explicit authorization from those sources
5.3.4 - Do not have the necessary licensing and permissions for all the locations where the app is used
Before we can continue with our review, please confirm that this app does not violate any of the above guidelines. You may reply to this message in Resolution Center or the App Review Information section in App Store Connect to verify this app’s compliance.
Given the tendency for apps of this type to violate the aforementioned guidelines, this review will take additional time. If at any time we discover that this app is in violation of these guidelines, the app will be rejected and removed from the App Store, and it may result in the termination of your Apple Developer Program account.
Should you choose to resubmit this app without confirming this app’s compliance, the next submission of this app will still require a longer review time. Additionally, this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until we have received your confirmation.
Best regards,
App Store Review
我看到这些问题 直接放弃救援了。
仔细分析 你就发现由于账号信用良好，账号下的app在首次提交审核的时候（版本升级一样的）他有一定的机率不过机审，但是当你被拒以后，不管有没有更新ipa包，他都会重新走一遍机审。
设计内购，直播，视频等相关应用，相关审核机制会特别严格，这份代码就算混淆也会一堆麻烦。
还有就是如果有可能 千万不要买别人的源码，千万个坑等你踩。
过包有机会，兄弟需努力。。。。。。
