从上个月开始，观看海上主题的电影，都是国外的海上电影。
前一段时间，有一位网友提议，可以看一下国内的海上电影，但是，我个人觉得，我们国内拍摄海上电影，一是比较少量，二是把海上主题的电影，仍然会拍摄成陆地上的电影。
今天下午，和几位热衷于看电影的朋友，在一起聊电影，我去问了几位，他们看的是国内还是国外的电影呢，他们几乎都是喜欢看国外的电影。他们都觉得，国内拍摄的电影，似乎都无法引起他们的观感。
我在说出自己也是没有这种观感的时候，是这样表达的。国内的电影内容主题，缺乏哲学立体思维体系的的表达，缺乏趋向未来的数学探索，在更多的还仅仅只是停留在语言哲学上的二维层面上分析。这样，导致了国内的电影，主题内容不是趋向于对过去的回忆，就是呈现于对未知将来的幻想。
我之所以，要围绕着海上主题来看电影，就是要通过百年来，人类在数学哲学和艺术哲学的最伟大的发展结合体一电影，来分析我们应该怎样构建起，趋向未来的思维结构？
到海上去，是中心化与去中心化冲突的一种趋向。在这种趋向之中，发现电影拍摄者，是如何把握住语言哲学，数学哲学和艺术哲学三个维度的共建。
整理了一下，这段时间看的外国海上主题电影。主要是美国的，英国（挪威，丹麦）的，德国的，俄罗斯的，日本的等一些经过了完整工业革命的资本主义国家海上主题电影。他们拍摄的海上主题电影，是延续哥伦布发现新大陆大航海去中心化拓展力量。他们拍摄的海上主题电影，是文艺复兴之后的工业革命产生了艺术哲学和数学哲学，相互融合的人文力量。他们拍摄海上主题电影，是趋向与未来的电子虚拟维度与原子世界维原的新世界。
（我整理了这段时间看过的外国海洋题材电影。它主要是美国、英国(挪威、丹麦)、德国、俄罗斯、日本等完成工业革命后的资本主义国家，拍摄的海上主题电影。他们以海洋为主题的电影是哥伦布发现“新大陆”大航海精神的延续。他们在海上拍摄的主题电影是文艺复兴后的工业革命，产生了艺术哲学和数学哲学相互融合的人文力量。他们制作以海洋为主题的电影，这些电影倾向于成为未来电子虚拟空间和原子世界的新世界。）
今天晚上，是中国传统节日，大年三十除夕夜。
中国传统节日中所谓的年和夕，都是从山里面出来的，而不是从海里来的。中国人到现在，仍然在盛行欢庆这种与山里面出来的猛兽对抗而获得胜利的日子，而不是某种从海里出来的怪物，如大白鲨之类的，也足以表现出中国的文化，更多的还是体现在农耕文化基础之上。
网络上，有人认真地分析了600年前中国航海者郑和，与500年前意大利航海家哥伦布。我也想去分析他们，我认可之前人们的对二位航海者的对比。但，我还想提出属于我自己的看法。
Translation from Chinese to English）
Since last month, watching movies on the theme of the sea are all foreign movies at sea.
Some time ago, a netizen suggested that we could watch domestic sea movies. However, I personally feel that one of our domestic maritime films is a relatively small number, and the other is that sea-themed films will still be filmed on land.
This afternoon, I talked about movies with several friends who were keen on watching movies. I went to ask how many of them saw movies at home or abroad. Almost all of them liked to watch foreign movies. They all feel that the films made in China do not seem to be able to arouse their perception.
This is what I say when I say that I do not have this kind of perception. The theme of film content in China is lack of the expression of philosophical stereoscopic thinking system, the lack of mathematical exploration towards the future, and the analysis on the two-dimensional level of language philosophy. In this way, resulting in domestic films, the theme content is not inclined to memories of the past, or presented in the unknown future fantasy.
The reason why I want to watch movies around the theme at sea is to analyze how we should construct and move towards the future thinking structure through the film, the greatest combination of human mathematical philosophy and artistic philosophy in the past hundred years.
Going to the sea is a trend of the conflict between centralization and decentralization. In this trend, it is found that the filmmaker is how to grasp the co-construction of the three dimensions of philosophy of language, philosophy of mathematics and philosophy of art.
I sorted out the foreign maritime theme movies I saw during this period. It is mainly the United States, the United Kingdom (Norway, Denmark), Germany, Russia, Japan and other capitalist countries after the complete industrial revolution at sea theme films. Their sea-themed films are a continuation of Columbus's discovery of the Great Navigation of the New World. The theme film they made at sea was the industrial revolution after the Renaissance, which produced the humanistic power of artistic philosophy and mathematical philosophy, which were integrated with each other. They make sea-themed films, which tend to be the new world with the electronic virtual dimension and the atomic world in the future.
Tonight, it is a traditional Chinese festival, New Year's Eve New year's Eve.
The so-called New year's Eve in traditional Chinese festivals come out of the mountains, not from the sea. To this day, the Chinese are still celebrating the victory against the beasts coming out of the mountains, rather than some kind of monster coming out of the sea, such as the great white shark, which is enough to show Chinese culture, and more on the basis of farming culture.
On the Internet, someone has carefully analyzed Zheng he, a Chinese navigator 600 years ago, and Columbus, an Italian navigator 500 years ago. I also want to analyze them, and I agree with the previous comparison of the two navigators. However, I would also like to make my own views. To the extent that it is not possible to make a difference between the two groups.
