1. As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically
acceptable, the arguer should demonstrate that ... . Additionally, the arguer
must provide * evidence to rule out all the above-mentioned possibilities
that might weaken the argument. / * more specific evidence to validate the
assumptions.
2. Overall, the reasoning ... seems logical as presented above. However,
before any final decisions are made about ... , ... should evaluate all
possible alternatives and causes for ... .
3. To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. Accordingly, it
is imprudent for the author to claim that ... . To make this argument
logically acceptable, the author would have to show that ... . In addition, to
solidify the conclusion, the author should provide concrete evidence as
well to demonstrate that ... . Only with more convincing evidence could this
argument become more than just an emotional appeal.
4. To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in
the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To
make the argument more convincing / to make it logically acceptable, the
author would have to provide more specific evidence concerning that ... .
