example:
Observable
.create(new ObservableOnSubscribe<Integer>() {
@Override
public void subscribe(ObservableEmitter<Integer> emitter) throws Exception {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "onNext()->1");
emitter.onNext(1);
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "subscribe()->2");
emitter.onNext(2);
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "subscribe()->3");
emitter.onNext(3);
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "subscribe()->onComplete()");
emitter.onComplete();
}
})
.doOnNext(new Consumer<Integer>() {
@Override
public void accept(Integer integer) throws Exception {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "accept()->integer:" + integer);
}
})
.subscribe(new Observer<Integer>() {
@Override
public void onSubscribe(Disposable disposable) {
sDisposable = disposable;
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "onSubscribe()");
}
@Override
public void onNext(Integer value) {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "onNext()->value:" + value);
}
@Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "onError()");
}
@Override
public void onComplete() {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "onComplete()");
}
});
doOnNext():
.doOnNext(new Consumer<Integer>() {
@Override
public void accept(Integer integer) throws Exception {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "accept()->integer:" + integer);
}
})
public interface Consumer<T> {
void accept(T t) throws Exception;
}
public abstract class Observable<T> implements ObservableSource<T> {
@SchedulerSupport(SchedulerSupport.NONE)
public final Observable<T> doOnNext(Consumer<? super T> onNext) {
return doOnEach(onNext, Functions.emptyConsumer(), Functions.EMPTY_ACTION, Functions.EMPTY_ACTION);
}
@SchedulerSupport(SchedulerSupport.NONE)
private Observable<T> doOnEach(Consumer<? super T> onNext, Consumer<? super Throwable> onError, Action onComplete, Action onAfterTerminate) {
return RxJavaPlugins.onAssembly(new ObservableDoOnEach<T>(this, onNext, onError, onComplete, onAfterTerminate));
}
}
public final class RxJavaPlugins {
return source;
}
class ObservableDoOnEach<T> extends AbstractObservableWithUpstream<T, T>;
abstract class AbstractObservableWithUpstream<T, U> extends Observable<U>;
- 1、doOnNext()返回了ObservableDoOnNext对象, 后边subcribe应当切换到ObservableDoOnNext中去.
new ObservableDoOnEach<T>(this, onNext, onError, onComplete, onAfterTerminate)
public final class ObservableDoOnEach<T> extends AbstractObservableWithUpstream<T, T> {
public ObservableDoOnEach(ObservableSource<T> source, Consumer<? super T> onNext,
Consumer<? super Throwable> onError,
Action onComplete,
Action onAfterTerminate) {
super(source);
}
}
abstract class AbstractObservableWithUpstream<T, U> extends Observable<U> implements HasUpstreamObservableSource<T> {
protected final ObservableSource<T> source;
AbstractObservableWithUpstream(ObservableSource<T> source) {
this.source = source;
}
}
什么时候能模仿着写出这种结构的代码, 什么时候就牛逼了
- 1、subscribe被ObservableDoOnEach调用, 但是ObservableDoOnEach内部又持有ObserverCreater的引用;
subscribe():
public abstract class Observable<T> implements ObservableSource<T> {
@SchedulerSupport(SchedulerSupport.NONE)
@Override
public final void subscribe(Observer<? super T> observer) {
observer = RxJavaPlugins.onSubscribe(this, observer);
subscribeActual(observer);
}
protected abstract void subscribeActual(Observer<? super T> observer);
}
- subscribeActual实际被子类ObservableDoOnEach调用;
public final class ObservableDoOnEach<T> extends AbstractObservableWithUpstream<T, T> {
@Override
public void subscribeActual(Observer<? super T> t) {
source.subscribe(new DoOnEachObserver<T>(t, onNext, onError, onComplete, onAfterTerminate));
}
}
- 最终还是走到了ObservableCreater里面的subscribeActual(), 而Observer是被DoOnEachObserver所实现;
static final class DoOnEachObserver<T> implements Observer<T>, Disposable {
Disposable s;
@Override
public void onSubscribe(Disposable s) {
if (DisposableHelper.validate(this.s, s)) {
this.s = s;
actual.onSubscribe(this);
}
}
}
public final class ObservableCreate<T> extends Observable<T> {
final ObservableOnSubscribe<T> source;
public ObservableCreate(ObservableOnSubscribe<T> source) {
this.source = source;
}
@Override
protected void subscribeActual(Observer<? super T> observer) {
CreateEmitter<T> parent = new CreateEmitter<T>(observer);
observer.onSubscribe(parent);
source.subscribe(parent);
}
}
- 1、ObservableCreate持有的Observer实际为DoOnEachObserver引用;
- 2、又通过observer.onSubscribe()将CreateEmitter传给了DoOnEachObserver中的Disposable s, 即s实际上指向的是CreateEmitter;
- 3、source指向的是ObservableCreate, 所以source.subscribe()将内部Observer指向了DoOnEachObserver;
- 4、actual.onSubscribe(this)将Disposable指向了DoOnEachObserver;
static final class CreateEmitter<T>
extends AtomicReference<Disposable>
implements ObservableEmitter<T>, Disposable {
CreateEmitter(Observer<? super T> observer) {...}
@Override
public void onNext(T t) {...}
@Override
public void onError(Throwable t) {...}
@Override
public void onComplete() {...}
@Override
public void setDisposable(Disposable d) {...}
@Override
public void setCancellable(Cancellable c) {...}
@Override
public ObservableEmitter<T> serialize() {...}
@Override
public void dispose() {...}
@Override
public boolean isDisposed() {...}
}
- 1、所以每次被观察者通过发射器emitter调用onError(), onNext(), onComplete()实际上最终都会先调用CreateEmitter的对应的方法, 然后再去调用DoOnEachObserver对应的方法;
- 2、Disposable实际上指向的是DoOnEachObserver, 所以调用dispose(), isDisposed()时实际走的是DoOnEachObserver内部的方法, 而DoOnEachObserver内部的Disposable s又指向了CreateEmitter, 所以最终决定观察者能否收到消息的决定权还是在CreateEmitter手中;
总结:
- 1、通过源码可以看到, onOnNext()的accept()方法仅仅只是在Observer的onXXX()方法被调用之前调用, 方且没有与Observer的调用之间没有任何关系;
- 2、所以doOnNext()这个方法可以用来在观察者Observer:onXXX()方法被调用之前进行一些初始化操作;
试试连续调用多个doOnNext()方法:
Observable
.create(new ObservableOnSubscribe<Integer>() {
@Override
public void subscribe(ObservableEmitter<Integer> emitter) throws Exception {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "subscribe->onNext()->1");
emitter.onNext(1);
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "subscribe()->onNext()->2");
emitter.onNext(2);
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "subscribe()->onNext()->3");
emitter.onNext(3);
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "subscribe()->onComplete()");
emitter.onComplete();
}
})
.doOnNext(new Consumer<Integer>() {
@Override
public void accept(Integer integer) throws Exception {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "accept()_1->integer:" + integer);
}
})
.doOnNext(new Consumer<Integer>() {
@Override
public void accept(Integer integer) throws Exception {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "accept()_2->integer:" + integer);
}
})
.subscribe(new Observer<Integer>() {
@Override
public void onSubscribe(Disposable disposable) {
sDisposable = disposable;
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "onSubscribe()");
}
@Override
public void onNext(Integer value) {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "onNext()->value:" + value);
}
@Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "onError()");
}
@Override
public void onComplete() {
LogUtils.log(Test01.class, "onComplete()");
}
});
打印结果如下所示:
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->onSubscribe()
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->subscribe->onNext()->1
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->accept()_1->integer:1
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->accept()_2->integer:1
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->onNext()->value:1
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->subscribe()->onNext()->2
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->accept()_1->integer:2
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->accept()_2->integer:2
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->onNext()->value:2
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->subscribe()->onNext()->3
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->accept()_1->integer:3
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->accept()_2->integer:3
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->onNext()->value:3
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->subscribe()->onComplete()
09-14 16:50:52.980 21493-21493/hb.com V/AndroidTest: Test01->onComplete()
结合源码看看为何打印会是这种打印结果;
下面的分析可能会很绕, 也可能会让人感觉废话连篇; 这也体现了RxJava架构的复杂性;
public abstract class Observable<T> implements ObservableSource<T> {
public static <T> Observable<T> create(ObservableOnSubscribe<T> source) {
return RxJavaPlugins.onAssembly(new ObservableCreate<T>(source));
}
}
public final class ObservableCreate<T> extends Observable<T> {
final ObservableOnSubscribe<T> source;
public ObservableCreate(ObservableOnSubscribe<T> source) {
this.source = source;
}
}
- 1、Observable指向ObservableCreate, ObservableCreate内部持有ObservableOnSubscribe的引用;
public abstract class Observable<T> implements ObservableSource<T> {
public final Observable<T> doOnNext(Consumer<? super T> onNext) {
return doOnEach(onNext, Functions.emptyConsumer(), Functions.EMPTY_ACTION, Functions.EMPTY_ACTION);
}
private Observable<T> doOnEach(Consumer<? super T> onNext, Consumer<? super Throwable> onError, Action onComplete, Action onAfterTerminate) {
return RxJavaPlugins.onAssembly(new ObservableDoOnEach<T>(this, onNext, onError, onComplete, onAfterTerminate));
}
}
public final class RxJavaPlugins {
public static <T> Observable<T> onAssembly(Observable<T> source) {
source;
}
}
public final class ObservableDoOnEach<T> extends AbstractObservableWithUpstream<T, T> {
final Consumer<? super T> onNext;
public ObservableDoOnEach(ObservableSource<T> source, Consumer<? super T> onNext,
Consumer<? super Throwable> onError,
Action onComplete,
Action onAfterTerminate) {
super(source);
this.onNext = onNext;
}
}
abstract class AbstractObservableWithUpstream<T, U> extends Observable<U> implements HasUpstreamObservableSource<T> {
protected final ObservableSource<T> source;
AbstractObservableWithUpstream(ObservableSource<T> source) {
this.source = source;
}
}
- 1、第一次调用doOnNext()以后, Observable指向了ObservableDoOnEach_1, 并将当前Observable的引用传给ObservableDoOnEach_1, 即ObservableDoOnEach_1持有ObservableCreate的引用, ObservableDoOnEach_1持有Consumer_1;
- 2、同理, 第二次调用doOnNext()以后, Observable指向了ObservableDoOnEach_2, 并将当前的Observable的引用传给了ObservableDoOnEach_2, 即 ObservableDoOnEach_2持有ObservableDoOnEach_1的引用. ObservableDoOnEach_2持有Consumer_2;
接下来看subscirbe(...)何如实现doOnNext()的连续调用:
public abstract class Observable<T> implements ObservableSource<T> {
public final void subscribe(Observer<? super T> observer) {
subscribeActual(observer);
}
protected abstract void subscribeActual(Observer<? super T> observer);
}
- 重点就是在subscribeActual()这个方法, 后边单线程操作符的话, 就只看这个方法了;
public final class ObservableDoOnEach<T> extends AbstractObservableWithUpstream<T, T> {
public void subscribeActual(Observer<? super T> t) {
source.subscribe(new DoOnEachObserver<T>(t, onNext, onError, onComplete, onAfterTerminate));
}
}
1、subscribeActual实际被ObservableDoOnEach_2调用, 而此时的source为ObservableDoOnEach_1, onNext为Consumer_2;
2、通过subscribe(...)将DoOnEachObserver_02的引用付给ObservableDoOnEach_1, 然后递推, 将DoOnEachObserver_1的引用付给ObservableCreate;
3、DoOnEachObserver_2持有的Observer actual实际为我们外部通过new Observer创建的引用;
4、ObservableDoOnEach_1调用subscribeActual(...)时传的参数Observer实际就是ObservableDoOnEach__2调用subscribeActual(...)时所创建的DoOnEachObserver_2, 所以DoOnEachObserver_1内部Observer actual实际指向的是DoOnEachObserver_2;
然后切到ObservableCreate中去:
public final class ObservableCreate<T> extends Observable<T> {
@Override
protected void subscribeActual(Observer<? super T> observer) {
CreateEmitter<T> parent = new CreateEmitter<T>(observer);
observer.onSubscribe(parent);
source.subscribe(parent);
}
}
- 1、CreateEmitter持有的Observer为DoOnEachObserver_1, DoOnEachObserver_1持有的Disposable为CreateEmitter, ObservableOnSubscribe持有CreateEmitter的引用;
static final class CreateEmitter<T> {
@Override
public void onNext(T t) {
observer.onNext(t);
}
}
static final class DoOnEachObserver<T> {
@Override
public void onNext(T t) {
onNext.accept(t);
actual.onNext(t);
}
}
- 当CreateEmitter调用一次onNext()时, DoOnEachObserver_1调用了自己的onNext()方法;
- 而此时onNext.accept()实际为Consumer_1.accept(t);
- actual.onNext()因为此时的acutal实际持有的是DoOnEachObserver_2的引用, 所以继续调用DoOnEachObserver_2.onNext(), DoOnEachObserver_2中的onNext()实际指向Consumer_2, 而actual实际指向我们通过new Observer创建的Observer对象;
通过几张图来对文字进行归纳总结: