Scientific Grant Writing - Session 2

  • Metaphor of a cereal

  • Readability statistics

  • Fog-Gunning Formula

Grade=0.4*nb of words/nb of sentences + 100*nb of words with > 2 syllables/nb of words

  • When you want to emphasise something, use short sentences.

  • First sentence: should be active and not too long.

  • Scientific writing style

  • Longer sentences

  • Intensive use of passive voice

  • Supremacy of nouns over verbs

  • Multi-syllabic nouns of latin of greek origin

  • Specialized vocabulary for specialized people

  • Hegde words to handle uncertainty

  • The first few sentences should address directly to the heading

  • Cover letter:

    • style: casual language, manuscript.
    • purpose: suitability; impact; decide whether to send to peer review
    • content: context; development of the field; show the big picture; significance and novelty; different way; specify reviewers;
  • Journal selector: edanz etc.

  • The Title

    • Starting words get more attention.
    • Keyword specificity: highly specific -> intermediary keyword -> Generic keyword
    • Non-search keywords and verbs
    • Keyword Choice
    • Clear contribution
    • Expectations
    • Qualities: unique/ lasting/ concise/ clear/ easy to find/ honest/ representative/ catchy
  • The Abstract

    • Attract or repulse the reader(filter)
    • Prepare the interested reader(peek)
    • Repeat title search Keywords
    • Explain and Justify adjectives, jargon
    • Parts: background, purpose, method, result, impact
    • Tense of abstract: present and present perfect
    • Qualities: complete, tied to title, concise and precise, stand-alone, representative, present.
  • Headings/subheadings

    • Use words in the title and abstract
    • Contributions should be the most intended(have the deepest level)
    • Consistency
    • Qualities: informative, tied to title and abstract, logical, consistent, concise
最后编辑于
©著作权归作者所有,转载或内容合作请联系作者
平台声明:文章内容(如有图片或视频亦包括在内)由作者上传并发布,文章内容仅代表作者本人观点,简书系信息发布平台,仅提供信息存储服务。

推荐阅读更多精彩内容