选自《经济学人》2015年6月27日。本文观点为强烈支持安乐死。选段为文章的最后一段。
文章链接：http://www.economist.com/node/21656182/print
需背诵。
本段特点：
从原则出发，在说理的同时诉诸情感，深化了论证。
全段共 5 句。前 4 句为道理论证（第三句也用了举例），第 5 句诉诸情感，引起了读者强烈的共鸣。4 句话的道理论证中本身就有一个完整的论证框架：1）先指出问题；2）说明不能只是因为问题而否决某个方案；3）举出相关、有说服力的平行的例子；4）回到问题本身，作总结。
精彩句型：
1）But it would be wrong to deny everyone to have the right to assisted death for this reason alone.
高频句型：But it would be wrong to do sth for this reason alone.
例1: But it would be wrong to cancel the plan for this reason alone.
例2: But it would be wrong to not give him a second chance for this reason alone.
例3: But it would be wrong to dismiss the solution for this reason alone.
2) The determined people do not always choose wisely, no matter how well they are counselled. （可直接使用！及背诵）
段落仿写示范：
作业：
答：
1）情景：因为工作薪水不够高就选择跳槽是不可取的。
造句：But it would be wrong to change one job to another frequently for this reason alone.
2）仿写：
The early childhood education classes are accused of utilitarianism for developing children’s intelligence too early. But it would be wrong to deny all the advantages brought by the early childhood education. Many splendid persons had accepted different kinds of early childhood education. Mozart, a famous musician, had learned piano more than three years before six. Edison, as known as an inventor, had tried many experiments when he was young. Children should have the chance to accept the early chvildhood education, in order to find out what they are good at, or improve their weakness.
感觉：仿写这个例子选的非常不恰当。但受思维局限，似乎暂时又想不出其他好的例子。等集体反馈的时候多听听老师讲。
