写作思路
1. 图表分析：先明确饼图展示的是大学图书馆用户的类别分布，表格呈现的是用户对图书馆不同方面的满意度。
2. 结构规划：开头段介绍图表主题；主体段1描述饼图中各类用户的占比情况；主体段2阐述表格中用户对图书馆各项服务的满意度数据，重点突出满意度高和低的方面；结尾段可简单总结整体情况。
3. 内容筛选：挑选饼图中占比突出（如全日制本科生占比最高）和表格中满意度差异明显（如员工帮助满意度极高、期刊和Wi - Fi可靠性满意度较低）的信息进行描述。
句型模板
- 开头段：The pie chart and the table respectively illustrate the distribution of library users at a university and the satisfaction levels of these users with different aspects of the library.
- 主体段1（饼图）：As can be seen from the pie chart, full - time undergraduates account for the largest proportion, making up 44% of the total library users. In contrast, academic staff represent the smallest group, with only 7%.
- 主体段2（表格）：Turning to the table, it is evident that users are most satisfied with the helpfulness of staff, as a remarkable 95% of them are very satisfied. However, the availability of journals and the reliability of wi - fi receive relatively lower satisfaction ratings, with 20% and 19% of users being not satisfied respectively.
写作注意事项
1. 数据准确性：确保引用的百分比数据准确无误，避免张冠李戴。
2. 逻辑连贯性：在描述不同图表内容时，使用恰当的连接词（如“in contrast”“turning to”等）使文章过渡自然。
3. 语言多样性：避免重复使用相同的词汇和句型，例如描述占比可以用“account for”“make up”“represent”等词汇替换。
4. 字数控制：保证文章字数不少于150词，同时也不要过于冗长，围绕核心信息展开描述。
参考范文1
The pie chart and the table respectively illustrate the distribution of library users at a university and the satisfaction levels of these users with different aspects of the library.
As can be seen from the pie chart, full - time undergraduates account for the largest proportion, making up 44% of the total library users. Full - time postgraduates follow, representing 25% of the users. Part - time postgraduates constitute 16%, while distance learning students (all courses) make up 8%. In contrast, academic staff represent the smallest group, with only 7%.
Turning to the table, it is evident that users are most satisfied with the helpfulness of staff, as a remarkable 95% of them are very satisfied and none are not satisfied. The library opening hours also enjoy high satisfaction, with 65% being very satisfied and 35% fairly satisfied. However, the availability of journals and the reliability of wi - fi receive relatively lower satisfaction ratings. Specifically, 20% of users are not satisfied with the availability of journals, and 19% are not satisfied with the reliability of wi - fi. The availability of books has a moderate level of dissatisfaction, with 10% of users being not satisfied.
Overall, full - time undergraduates are the main library users, and users generally have high satisfaction with staff helpfulness and opening hours but relatively lower satisfaction with journal availability and wi - fi reliability.
中文译文
该饼图和表格分别展示了一所大学图书馆用户的分布情况以及这些用户对图书馆不同方面的满意度水平。
从饼图可以看出，全日制本科生所占比例最大，占图书馆用户总数的44%。全日制研究生紧随其后，占用户的25%。非全日制研究生占16%，而远程教育学生（所有课程）占8%。相比之下，学术人员所占比例最小，仅为7%。
再看表格，很明显，用户对员工的帮助最为满意，高达95%的用户非常满意，且没有用户不满意。图书馆的开放时间也获得了较高的满意度，65%的用户非常满意，35%的用户比较满意。然而，期刊的可用性和Wi - Fi的可靠性获得的满意度相对较低。具体来说，20%的用户对期刊的可用性不满意，19%的用户对Wi - Fi的可靠性不满意。图书的可用性有中等程度的不满意情况，10%的用户不满意。
总体而言，全日制本科生是主要的图书馆用户，用户对员工的帮助和开放时间普遍满意度较高，但对期刊可用性和Wi - Fi可靠性的满意度相对较低。
写作思路
1. 分段规划
- Introduction：
改写题目，说明饼图展示了图书馆用户的构成比例，表格展示了各项服务的满意度。
- Overview：
总结两大核心趋势——① 全日制学生是绝对主力；② 满意度差异明显，员工服务最受好评，期刊和Wi-Fi问题最大。
- Body Paragraph 1（饼图）：
按占比从大到小描述，可合并相近数据（如全日制学生合计69%）。
- Body Paragraph 2（表格）：
按满意度高低分组描述，突出极端数据（95%非常满意、0%不满意）和最低满意项。
2. 数据取舍
- 不必罗列所有百分比，重点写最高值、最低值、显著对比和特殊数据（如0%）。
- 饼图中远程学习和教职工占比较小，可用"merely / only"带过。
高分词伙
占比 account for / represent / constitute / make up
排序 rank first / come second / trail behind
对比 By contrast, / Whereas / While / Compared to
合并数据 combine to reach / collectively represent
满意度 receive the highest approval / cause the most concern
无人不满意 no respondents expressed dissatisfaction
写作注意事项
1. 时态：调查已完成，主体用一般过去时（showed, accounted for, were）。
2. Overview必须有：放在第二段，是高分关键。
3. 避免主观观点：不要写"I think"或"the university should"，只客观描述数据。
4. 不要漏图：两个图表都要提及，但篇幅可不均分。
5. 词汇替换：不要重复"show"，可用illustrate, present, depict, compare。
参考范文2
（约185词）
The pie chart and table present the findings of a survey conducted among library users at a university, illustrating the composition of user categories and their levels of satisfaction with various services.
Overall, full-time students constituted the vast majority of library users, while satisfaction levels varied considerably across different aspects, with staff performance receiving the highest approval and both journal availability and Wi-Fi reliability causing the most concern.
According to the pie chart, full-time undergraduates represented the largest group, accounting for 44% of all users. Full-time postgraduates made up the second largest category at 25%, meaning that nearly seven in ten users were full-time students. Part-time postgraduates accounted for 16%, whereas distance learners and academic staff constituted merely 8% and 7% respectively.
Turning to the table, the helpfulness of staff was the most highly rated aspect, with 95% of respondents being very satisfied and nobody expressing dissatisfaction. Similarly, opening hours were well received, as all users were at least fairly satisfied. By contrast, availability of journals and reliability of Wi-Fi were less satisfactory, with 20% and 19% respectively reporting that they were not satisfied. The availability of books fell in the middle, with half of the users very satisfied and 10% dissatisfied.
中文译文
饼图和表格呈现了一项针对某大学图书馆用户开展的调查结果，分别展示了用户类别的构成比例以及他们对各项服务的满意程度。
总体而言，全日制学生构成了图书馆用户的绝大多数，而不同服务项目的满意度差异显著，其中员工服务获得了最高评价，而期刊可获得性和Wi-Fi可靠性则最令人担忧。
根据饼图，全日制本科生是最大的用户群体，占所有用户的44%。全日制研究生是第二大类别，占25%，这意味着近七成的用户为全日制学生。兼职研究生占16%，而远程学习者和教职工分别仅占8%和7%。
转向表格数据，员工 helpfulness 是评分最高的方面，95%的受访者表示非常满意，且无人表示不满意。同样，开放时间也获得了良好评价，所有用户至少达到了基本满意。相比之下，期刊可获得性和Wi-Fi可靠性则较不理想，分别有20%和19%的受访者表示不满意。书籍可获得性处于中间水平，一半的用户非常满意，10%的人不满意。
